PROSPECTS FOR IMPROVING THE STRUCTURE OF ARTICLE 111-1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE & PROBLEMS OF CLASSIFYING COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES

Keywords: collaborationism, aiding and abetting an aggressor state, temporarily occupied territory, criminal offenses against the. foundations of national security of Ukraine, criminal liability, differentiation of criminal liability, punishment, criminalization, qualifying features, official

Abstract

The article considers the problem of excessive structuring and lack of proper classification of forms of
collaboration consolidated within the framework of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine "Collaborative
Activities". Referring to specific examples from judicial practice, it is demonstrated that the aforementioned
structuring has primarily led to unjustified differentiation of responsibility for manifestations of collaborative
activities, the degree of public danger of which does not differ significantly.
The scientific views on the classification of forms of collaborative activities provided for in Art. 111-1 of the
Criminal Code of Ukraine are analyzed. It is substantiated that even the best examples of the relevant
classifications can be useful only at the stage of criminalization as a basis for further determination of specific
manifestations of collaborative activities that should be criminalized in the relevant areas, or at least for proper
regulation of responsibility for acts that have a similar nature and degree of public danger. At the same time, it is
argued that no classification can serve as a proper basis for differentiating criminal liability for individual types
of collaborationism, the features of the components of which are described either within different parts of the same
article, or even in separate articles, which is explained by the fact that such theoretical classifications do not solve
the problem of close interrelation and conditionality and, as a result, the mixing of different types of
collaborationism, which is why in practice almost every real manifestation of the corresponding socially
dangerous behavior must be regarded as collaborationism of different types, and therefore - be qualified by a set
of several separate norms (in which independent components are described), which provide for liability for their
commission.
Taking into account the arguments presented in the article, as well as the experience of regulating criminal
liability for collaborative activities in the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine, it is proposed to unify criminal
liability for all types of collaborative activities and provide for it within a single structure with alternative actions,
which should be the corresponding forms of collaborative activities.

References

1. Pysmenskyi, Ye. O., Movchan, R. O. (2022). Ideolohichnyi ta kulturno-osvitnii

kolaboratsionizm: okremi problemy tlumachennia ta vdoskonalennia zakonodavstva. Naukovyi visnyk

Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav [Scientific Bulletin of the

Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs], 2, S. 8–16. DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2022-2-8-16

[in Ukrainian]

2. Rubashchenko, M. A., Yakoviuk, I. V., Shulzhenko, N. V., Zaitsev, O. V., Kharytonov, S. O.

(2024). Kolaboratsionizm na tymchasovo okupovanykh terytoriiakh: problemy pravovoi otsinky,

harantuvannia prav i svobod ta reintehratsii terytorii : monohrafiia [Collaborationism in temporarily

occupied territories: problems of legal assessment, guaranteeing rights and freedoms, and reintegration of

territories: monohrafiia]. Kharkiv : Pravo [in Ukrainian]

3. Movchan, R. O. (2022). «Voienni» novely Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: pravotvorchi ta

pravozastosovni problemy : monohrafiia ["Military" Novels of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: Law-Making

and Law-Enforcement Problems: monohrafiia]. Kyiv : Norma prava [in Ukrainian].

4. Pysmenskyi, Ye. O. (2024). Kryminalno-pravovi problemy protydii kolaboratsiinii diialnosti :

monohrafiia [Criminal law problems of countering collaborative activities: monograph]. Kyiv : Alerta [in

Ukrainian].

5. Miskiv, T. I. (2024). Karanist kolaboratsiinoi diialnosti (st. 111-1 KK Ukrainy): analiz sanktsii

zakonodavchoi novely. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal [Legal scientific electronic journal], 11,

S. 408–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-11/94 [in Ukrainian]

6. Vyrok Zhovtnevoho raionnoho sudu m. Zaporizhzhia vid 12 hrudnia 2024 r. u spravi №

331/3948/24 [Verdict of the Zhovtnevy District Court of Zaporizhzhia dated December 12, 2024 in case No.

331/3948/24]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/123717996 [in Ukrainian]

7. Vyrok Ivano-Frankivskoho miskoho Ivano-Frankivskoi oblasti vid 1 serpnia 2024 r. u spravi №

344/8405/24 [Verdict of the Ivano-Frankivsk City Court of Ivano-Frankivsk Region dated August 1, 2024

in case No. 344/8405/24]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/120764869 [in Ukrainian]

8. Vyrok Zarichnoho raionnoho sudu m. Sumy vid 22 hrudnia 2023 r. u spravi № 591/4058/22

[Verdict of the Zarechny District Court of Sumy dated December 22, 2023 in case No. 591/4058/22].

Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/115842533 [in Ukrainian]

9. Vyrok Rivnenskoho miskoho sudu Rivnenskoi oblasti vid 10 chervnia 2024 r. u spravi №

569/12655/23 [Verdict of the Rivne City Court of Rivne Region dated June 10, 2024 in case No.

569/12655/23]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/120511652 [in Ukrainian]

10. Vyrok Dzerzhynskoho miskoho sudu m. Kharkova vid 28 hrudnia 2022 r. u spravi

№ 638/7303/22 [Verdict of the Dzerzhynskyi City Court of Kharkiv dated December 28, 2022 in case No.

638/7303/22]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108152933. [in Ukrainian]

11. Vyrok Ivano-Frankivskoho miskoho sudu Ivano-Frankivskoi oblasti vid 6 chervnia 2024 r. u

spravi № 344/20468/23 [Verdict of the Ivano-Frankivsk City Court of Ivano-Frankivsk Region dated June

6, 2024 in case No. 344/20468/23]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/120764869 [in

Ukrainian]

12. Vyrok Novomoskovskoho miskraionnoho sudu Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti vid 30 zhovtnia 2024

r. u spravi № 183/1489/23 [Verdict of the Novomoskovsk City District Court of Dnipropetrovsk Region

dated October 30, 2024 in case No. 183/1489/23]. Retrieved from:

https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/122661343 [in Ukrainian]

13. Rubashchenko, M. A. (2023). Kryminalno-pravova klasyfikatsiia kolaboratsiinoi diialnosti (st.

111-1 KK). Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal [Legal scientific electronic journal], 10, S. 501–506.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-10/122 [in Ukrainian]

14. Vyrok Halytskoho raionnoho sudu m. Lvova vid 20 zhovtnia 2025 r. u spravi № 461/5385/25

[Verdict of the Halytskyi District Court of Lviv dated October 20, 2025 in case No. 461/5385/25]. Retrieved

from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/131114081 [in Ukrainian]

15. Kontrolnyi tekst Proiektu novoho Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (stanom na 22 liutoho 2026

r.) [Control text of the Draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine (as of February 22, 2026)]. Retrieved

from: https://newcriminalcode.org.ua/criminal-code [in Ukrainian]

16. Rubashchenko, M. A., Movchan, R. O. (2023). Kryminalni pravoporushennia proty derzhavnoi

bezpeky v proiekti novoho Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo

[Analytical and comparative jurisprudence], 3, S. 328–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-

6018.2023.03.60 [in Ukrainian]

Published
2026-07-03
How to Cite
Movchan, R. (2026) “PROSPECTS FOR IMPROVING THE STRUCTURE OF ARTICLE 111-1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE & PROBLEMS OF CLASSIFYING COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES”, Art of Justice, (1 (33), pp. 240-251. doi: 10.33098/3083-726X.2026.1.33.240-251.
Section
CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINOLOGY, PENAL PARVO. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, CRIMINOLOGY AND FORE