FORCED RE-REGISTRATION OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN THE TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF UKRAINE

Keywords: forced re-registration, religious organisation, freedom of conscience, occupied territories, Crimea, Donbas, Russian Orthodox Church, internatioal, humanitarian law, Russia, freedom of religion

Abstract

The purpose of this study is a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of the mechanism of forced re-
registration of religious organisations in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine – the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea, certain districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, and the additionally seized regions after the
full-scale invasion of 24 February 2022 – aimed at identifying the legal grounds, administrative instruments, and
consequences of this mechanism for various religious confessions. The comparative legal method was used to
compare the regulatory and legal regulation of state-religious regulation in Ukraine (Law No. 987-XII of 1991)
and the Russian Federation (FZ No. 125-FZ of 1997 and the «Yarovaya package» of 2016) according to the
following parameters: registration conditions, grounds for refusal, legal status of unregistered communities,
sanctions for activities without registration. The formal legal method was used to analyze the provisions of Articles
43 and 64 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, as well as Article 18 of the ICCPR in the context of their application to
occupation registration practices. The system-analytical method allowed us to reconstruct the re-registration
algorithm as a four-stage repressive system. Content analysis aims to identify recurring patterns of violations in
reports by USCIRF, Forum 18, the UN Monitoring Mission, and materials from the Kharkiv Human Rights Group
for 2014–2026. The chronological boundaries of the study cover the period from the annexation of the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea in March 2014 to April 1, 2026. The study establishes that re-registration is a targeted state
mechanism for eliminating religious diversity, securing a monopoly for the Russian Orthodox Church in the
occupied territories. The mechanism is implemented through an insurmountable system of legal barriers,
administrative pressure, armed raids during worship services, criminal prosecution, and deportation of clergy,
in gross violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention and Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Over the years of occupation, more than 1,200 religious organisations have been expelled or
forcibly closed in Crimea; Baptists and Pentecostals in Donbas have lost approximately 95% of their communities.
The article proposes a conceptualization of the forced re-registration of religious organizations as a mechanism
of occupation-based selective legal personality, which turns the registration procedure into a tool for admitting or
displacing religious communities depending on their loyalty, confessional acceptability, and willingness to act
within the legal order of the occupying state. The findings may be used to build evidentiary bases in international
judicial instances, develop restitution claims regarding seized property of religious organisations, and improve
Ukraine’s state monitoring policy on freedom of conscience in the occupied territories.

References

1. Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group. 2025. Over 1200 religious organizations closed or

driven out of Russian-occupied Crimea. URL: https://khpg.org/en/1608814337 [in English]

2. U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). 2025. 2025 Annual Report –

Russia Chapter. URL: https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2025-

04/Russia%202025%20USCIRF%20Annual%20Report.pdf [in English]

3. U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). 2023. Russia’s Religious

Freedom Violations in Ukraine: Issue Update. URL: https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2023-

07/2023%20Russias%20Religious%20Freedom%20Violations%20in%20Ukraine%20Issue%20Update_

07.05.2023.pdf [in English]

4. U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). 2016. Crimea: Religious

Freedom Abuses Must Stop. URL: https://www.uscirf.gov/news-room/releases-statements/crimea-

religious-freedom-abuses-must-stop [in English]

5. U.S. Department of State. 2024. 2023 Report on International Religious Freedom: Ukraine. URL:

https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-report-on-international-religious-freedom/ukraine

6. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2023. Report on the Human

Rights Situation in Ukraine, 1 August – 30 November 2023 (37th Periodic Report). URL:

https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/37-periodic-report-EN [in Ukrainian]

7. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2015. Guidelines on the Legal

Personality of Religious or Belief Communities. Warsaw, 4 February 2015. URL:

https://www.osce.org/odihr/139046 [in English]

8. Forum 18 News Service. 2025. Occupied Ukraine: Religious Freedom Survey, March 2025. URL:

https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2963 [in English]

9. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. 2025. Statement of the MFA of Ukraine Regarding the

Atrocities and Persecution by the Russian Federation against Clergy, Religious Communities, and

Believers in the Temporarily Occupied Territories of Ukraine. 10 April 2025. URL:

https://rsa.mfa.gov.ua/en/news/statement-mfa-ukraine-regarding-atrocities-and-persecution-russian-

federation-against-clergy-religious-communities-and-believers-temporarily-occupied-territories-ukraine

[in Ukrainian]

10. Donetsk Exarchate of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. 2022. Official Statement of the

Donetsk Exarchate of the UGCC Regarding the Illegal Arrest of Priests in Berdiansk. 26 November 2022.

URL: https://synod.ugcc.ua/data/ofitsiyna-zayava-donetskogo-ekzarhatu-ugkts-z-pryvodu-

nezakonnogo-areshtu-svyashchennykiv-u-berdyansku-10749/ [in Ukrainian]

11. Moscow Patriarchate. 2022. Journals of the Holy Synod of 7 June 2022. Journal No. 59. URL:

https://mospat.ru/ru/news/89358/ [in Ukrainian]

12. Moscow Patriarchate. 2022. Rovenky Diocese. URL: https://patriarchia.ru/ua/church/orgs/org-

ru/org/415 [in English]

13. Moscow Patriarchate. 2022. Patriarchal Sermon on Cheesefare Sunday after the Liturgy in the

Cathedral of Christ the Savior. 6 March 2022. URL: https://www.patriarchia.ru/article/102978 [in

Ukrainian]

14. Moscow Patriarchate. 2023. Address of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill at a Meeting with Young

Athletes from Donbas. 26 February 2023. URL: https://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/6006766.html [in

Ukrainian]

15. World Russian People’s Council. 2024. The Decree of the XXV World Russian People’s Council

“The Present and Future of the Russian World”. URL: https://vrns.ru/documents/xxv-vrns-nastoyashhee-

i-budushhee-russkogo-mira/ [in Ukrainian]

16. Institute for Religious Freedom. 2022. Russian Attacks on Religious Freedom in Ukraine:

Research, Analytics, Recommendations / edited by Oleksandr Zaiets and Maksym Vasin. Kyiv. URL:

https://irf.in.ua/files/publications/2022.09-IRF-Ukraine-report-ENG.pdf [in English]

17. Vasin, Maksym. 2024. The Impact of the Russian Invasion on Faith-Based Communities in

Ukraine. Institute for Religious Freedom. Kyiv. URL: https://irf.in.ua/files/publications/2024.03-IRF-

Ukraine-report-ENG-web.pdf [in English]

18. Mission Eurasia. 2025. Faith Under Russian Terror: The Religious Dimension of Russia’s War

Against Ukraine. URL: https://missioneurasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025-Mission-Eurasia-

report-on-Ukraine-ENG.pdf [in English]

19. Baptist Press. 2025. Chandler, Diana. USCIRF Cites Russia’s “Blatant” Religious Freedom

Violations as Ukraine Peace Talks Stall. 1 July 2025. URL: https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-

library/news/uscirf-cites-russias-blatant-religious-freedom-violations-as-ukraine-peace-talks-stall/

20. Vovk, Dmytro. 2023. Ukraine: Implications for Religious Freedom. Written Testimony for the U.S.

Commission on International Religious Freedom Hearing “Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: Implications for

Religious Freedom”. 15 March 2023. URL:

https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/Dmytro%20Vovk%20Testimony.pdf [in English]

21. Wanner, Catherine. 2022. Everyday Religiosity and the Politics of Belonging in Ukraine. Ithaca:

Cornell University Press. URL: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62030

22. Beliakova, Nadezhda, and Köllner, Tobias. 2023. Anti-Cult Movement and Religious Freedom for

Religious Minorities in the Russian Arctic. Religions, 14(8), 1062. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-

1444/14/8/1062 [in English]

23. Stoeckl, Kristina. 2024. The Pact of the Old Guard: Religion, Law, and Politics for a Russia at

War. Journal of Law and Religion, 39(3), 482–493. URL:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/pact-of-the-old-guard-

religion-law-and-politics-for-a-russia-at-war/939648BE1590CA95F141B1FDC658FB65 [in English]

24. Green, M. Christian. 2024. Religion and State in Russia: Introduction. Journal of Law and

Religion, 39(3). URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-

religion/article/religion-and-state-in-russia-introduction/00C8414C1F76E5BC8D9E0501AF89532F

25. Fagan, Geraldine. 2013. Believing in Russia: Religious Policy after Communism. London; New

York: Routledge. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203095379/believing-

russia-religious-policy-communism-geraldine-fagan [in English]

26. Eastern Human Rights Group and Institute for Strategic Studies. 2025. Religion in the

Temporarily Occupied Territories. December 2025. Secondary reference: RISU. Russia Strengthens

Control over the Re-registration of Religious Organizations in the Temporarily Occupied Territories. 22

December 2025. URL: https://risu.ua/rf-posilyuye-kontrol-z-perereyestraciyi-religijnih-organizacij-na-

tot_n161106 [in Ukrainian]

27. Radio Liberty. 2017. “DNR” Grouping and Religion. Donbas.Realii. 6 January 2017. URL:

https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/28217599.html [in Ukrainian]

Published
2026-07-02
How to Cite
Kotylko, Y. (2026) “FORCED RE-REGISTRATION OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN THE TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF UKRAINE”, Art of Justice, (1 (33), pp. 111-125. doi: 10.33098/3083-726X.2026.1.33.111-125.
Section
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND PROCEDURE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE, FINANCIAL LA