«DIGITAL DISINFORMATION» IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERSTATE INTERACTION

Keywords: polluted information, disinformation, digital disinformation, foreign digital disinformation, disinformation news, disinformation operation, disinformation campaign, FIMI, LLM grooming, narrative, international interaction, international relations, foreign state

Abstract

The article explores the concept of “digital disinformation” and the role of this phenomenon in the system of
interstate interaction. It demonstrates that digital disinformation is a type of a broader contemporary
phenomenon derived from technological achievements – polluted information. It is noted that the fundamental
principle of conventionality in modern international law forms the basis of interstate interaction, but at the same
time creates its vulnerability. Therefore, the dissemination of false information in the interstate space can be seen
as a kind of response to the anarchic nature of the international system, which results from the absence of a
supranational authority capable of guaranteeing the complete security of states. Under such conditions, states are
forced to constantly ensure their own survival, which creates incentives to use deception as a political tool.
Accordingly, the dissemination of false information by one state within the territory of another can be considered
a natural and rational element of state strategy.
The main ontological forms of digital disinformation in the international space are: disinformation news,
disinformation campaigns, and disinformation operations (the article provides examples of these ontological
forms and assesses their effectiveness in terms of achieving the desired outcome). The spread of digital
disinformation employs the full arsenal of information and communication technologies, but at the current stage,
the most in-demand tools are social networks, messengers, and AI, which trains and fills large language models
(LLMs) with the “needed” information. In the sphere of international interaction, digital disinformation is
disseminated for: achieving political goals by interfering in the domestic politics of another state; gaining an
advantage in conditions of overt or covert aggression; destabilizing the internal legal order and social balance of
another state; and achieving propaganda objectives. The content of digital disinformation is oriented toward the
cultural and political characteristics of the region.

References

1. Politica Nacional de Inteligencia. Decreto nº 8.793, de 29 de junho de 2016. Presidencia da

Republica. (Br2016) [National Intelligence Policy. Decree No. 8,793, of June 29, 2016. Presidency of the

Republic. (Br2016)]. Retrieved from: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-

2018/2016/decreto/d8793.htm [in Portuguese].

2. Mearsheimer John J. (2011). Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics.

Retrieved from: https://dokumen.pub/why-leaders-lie-the-truth-about-lying-in-international-

politics.html [in English].

3. La Cour C. (2020). Theorising Digital Disinformation in International Relations. Іnternational

Politics. № 57. Р. 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00215-x Retrieved from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338914971_Theorising_digital_disinformation_in_internatio

nal_relations [in English].

4. Kruijver K., Finlayson N., Cadet B., Van der Meer S. (2025). The disinformation lifecycle: an

integrated understanding of its creation, spread and effects. Retrieved from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392741972_The

disinformation

_

_lifecycle_

an

_integrated_

un

derstanding_

of

its

creation

_

_

_spread_

and

_

effects [in English].

5. Humprecht E., Esser F., Van Aelst P (2020). Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for

cross-national comparative research. International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3):493-516. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126 [in English].

6. Yildiz I. (2025). Sosyal Medyada Dijital Dezenformasyon: Iletisim Baskanligi Filistin Ozel Bulteni

Uzerine Bir Analiz. February 2025 [Digital Disinformation on Social Media: An Analysis of the Presidency

of Communications' Special Bulletin on Palestine. February 2025]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler

Enstitüsü Dergisi. 11. Р. 163-182 DOI:10.31592/aeusbed.1595546. Retrieved from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389461260_Sosyal_Medyada_Dijital_Dezenformasyon_Ileti

sim_Baskanligi_Filistin_Ozel_Bulteni_Uzerine_Bir_Analiz [in Turkish].

7. Wardle C., Derakhshan H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework

for research and policy making. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-

interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c> [in English].

8. Darshan H. (2022). The Evolution of War; From First Generation Warfare to Fifth Generation

Warfare. Retrieved from: https://www.ugc.wionews.com [in English].

9. Homilko O. (2025). Fenomen feiku u tsyfrovykh vyklykakh suchasnoi kultury. Humanities studies:

Collection of Scientific Papers. № 22 (99). P. 34–41. doi https://doi.org/10.32782/hst-2025-22-99-04 [in

Ukrainian].

10. 3rd EEAS Report on Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Threats Exposing the

architecture of FIMI operations March 2025. Retrieved from:

https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/2025/EEAS-3nd-ThreatReport-March-2025-

05-Digital-HD.pdf [in English].

11. Khan I. (2021). Khan I. Disinformation and freedom of opinion and expression : report of the

Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression.

Geneva. UN. 13 Apr. Retrieved from:

https://eos.cartercenter.org/uploads/document_file/path/985/Report_ [in English].

12. Saienko O. H. (2025). Mekhanizm informatsiino-psykholohichnoho vplyvu v umovakh hibrydnoi

viiny [The mechanism of informational and psychological influence in the conditions of hybrid warfare].

Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia: Psykholohiia. № 1.

Retrieved from: https://lib.nadpsu.edu.ua/eldocs/BooksShow4/Vnadpn_2015_1_11. pdf. [in Ukrainian].

13. Sydorenko V. (2023) Vybory na Taivani: yak Pekin namahaietsia skorystatysia «viknom

mozhlyvostei» [Taiwan elections: how Beijing is trying to seize the "window of opportunity"]. Retrieved

from: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-world/3805614-vibori-na-tajvani-ak-pekin-namagaetsa-

skoristatisa-viknom-mozlivostej.htm l [in Ukrainian].

14. Vyklyk pryvydu Reikhu [Calling the Ghost of Reich]. (2025). Retrieved from:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/ua/%d0%b2%d0%b8%d0%ba%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%ba-

%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b8%d0%b2%d0%b8%d0%b4%d1%83-

%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%b9%d1%85%d1%83/ [in Ukrainian].

Published
2026-07-01
How to Cite
Vovk, V. (2026) “«DIGITAL DISINFORMATION» IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERSTATE INTERACTION”, Art of Justice, (1 (33), pp. 92-99. doi: 10.33098/3083-726X.2026.1.33.92-99.
Section
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND PROCEDURE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE, FINANCIAL LA